渗漏排污污染长江?判刑!

English title (machine-translated)
Leakage of Pollutants into the Yangtze River: Severe Punishment.
Published
2025-05-30
Type
Law, regulation or policy
Subtype
法治
Level
Central Authorities
Length
1461 characters, 9 paragraphs
Author
被告单位某环保公司违反国家规定,非法排放含有重金属的污染物超过国家污染物排放标准3倍,严重污染环境,其行为已构成污染环境罪。被告人程某作为某环保公司的法定代表人,是直接负责的主管人员,被告人曾某是被告单位某环保公司该项目现场管理人员,被告人姚某是公司员工,均是该被告单位实施污染环境行为的直接责任人员。
Editor
责任编辑:王瑜

Summary

(1)  A Chinese environmental protection company with a secondary qualification for industrial wastewater treatment was contracted by a property company to guarantee that 100% of the wastewater entering the wastewater treatment station would be processed. During the operation of the project, the project site management staff discovered a leakage in the No. 1 adjustment pool and reported it to the legal representative of the environmental protection company, Cheng. Cheng summoned the project staff and instructed them to use the leakage in the No. 1 adjustment pool to secretly discharge untreated electroplating wastewater. The project site management staff then pumped the wastewater into the No. 1 adjustment pool for leakage. The environmental monitoring team of the Chongqing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Bureau discovered the secret discharge. Sampling monitoring found that the concentration of hexavalent chromium and total chromium in the wastewater leaking from the No. 1 adjustment pool exceeded the national pollution discharge standard by 29.5 times and 9.9 times, respectively. The defendant company, the environmental protection company, violated national regulations by illegally discharging pollutants containing heavy metals exceeding three times the national pollution discharge standard, severely polluting the environment, and committed the crime of polluting the environment.

(2)  Cheng, the legal representative of the environmental protection company, as the directly responsible supervisor, and Zeng and Yao, employees of the company, were directly responsible for the company's environmental pollution behavior. The Chongqing Yubei District People's Court made a judgment, convicting the environmental protection company of the crime of polluting the environment and imposing a fine of 80,000 yuan. Cheng was sentenced to 9 months in prison and fined 40,000 yuan for the crime of polluting the environment. Zeng was sentenced to 8 months in prison and fined 20,000 yuan for the crime of polluting the environment. Yao was sentenced to 6 months in prison, suspended for 2 years, and fined 10,000 yuan for the crime of polluting the environment.

(3)  This case is a water pollution criminal case caused by discharging wastewater into the Yangtze River. The environmental protection company, as a company with industrial wastewater treatment qualifications, knowingly had a leakage in the No. 1 adjustment pool and directly discharged untreated electroplating wastewater into the Yangtze River, severely polluting the river water, and should be held criminally responsible. The court fully played the role of environmental resource adjudication and comprehensively handled the case, imposing heavier penalties on the environmental protection company with wastewater treatment qualifications, providing a good example for serving the ecological civilization construction of the Yangtze River Basin.

Original

(1)  【基本案情】 某环保公司是具有工业废水处理二级资质的企业。该环保公司与某物业公司签订协议,承诺保证排入污水处理站的废水得到100%处理。在运营该项目过程中,项目现场管理人员发现1号调节池有渗漏现象,向某环保公司法定代表人程某报告。程某召集项目工作人员开会,要求利用1号调节池的渗漏,偷排未经完全处理的电镀废水。项目现场管理人员遂将废水抽入1号调节池进行渗漏。重庆市环境监察总队现场检查发现了该偷排行为。经采样监测,1号调节池渗漏的废水中六价铬、总铬浓度分别超标29.5倍、9.9倍。 被告单位某环保公司违反国家规定,非法排放含有重金属的污染物超过国家污染物排放标准3倍,严重污染环境,其行为已构成污染环境罪。被告人程某作为某环保公司的法定代表人,是直接负责的主管人员,被告人曾某是被告单位某环保公司该项目现场管理人员,被告人姚某是公司员工,均是该被告单位实施污染环境行为的直接责任人员。 【裁判结果】 重庆市渝北区人民法院作出判决,该环保公司犯污染环境罪,判处罚金8万元;被告人程某犯污染环境罪,判处有期徒刑9个月,并处罚金4万元。被告人曾某犯污染环境罪,判处有期徒刑8个月,并处罚金2万元。被告人姚某犯污染环境罪,判处有期徒刑6个月,缓刑2年,并处罚金1万元。 【指导性意义】 本案是向长江干流排放污水引发的水污染刑事案件。其中,某环保公司作为具有工业废水处理资质的企业,在受托处理工业废水过程中,明知调节池有渗漏现象,仍将未经完全处理的电镀废水以渗漏方式直接向长江干流排放,严重污染长江水体,应当依法承担刑事责任。人民法院充分发挥环境资源审判职能作用,综合全案情节,对具有废水处理资质的某环保公司酌情从重处罚,为服务保障长江流域生态文明建设提供了较好范本。

(2)  【基本案情】

(3)  某环保公司是具有工业废水处理二级资质的企业。该环保公司与某物业公司签订协议,承诺保证排入污水处理站的废水得到100%处理。在运营该项目过程中,项目现场管理人员发现1号调节池有渗漏现象,向某环保公司法定代表人程某报告。程某召集项目工作人员开会,要求利用1号调节池的渗漏,偷排未经完全处理的电镀废水。项目现场管理人员遂将废水抽入1号调节池进行渗漏。重庆市环境监察总队现场检查发现了该偷排行为。经采样监测,1号调节池渗漏的废水中六价铬、总铬浓度分别超标29.5倍、9.9倍。

(4)  被告单位某环保公司违反国家规定,非法排放含有重金属的污染物超过国家污染物排放标准3倍,严重污染环境,其行为已构成污染环境罪。被告人程某作为某环保公司的法定代表人,是直接负责的主管人员,被告人曾某是被告单位某环保公司该项目现场管理人员,被告人姚某是公司员工,均是该被告单位实施污染环境行为的直接责任人员。

(5)  【裁判结果】

(6)  重庆市渝北区人民法院作出判决,该环保公司犯污染环境罪,判处罚金8万元;被告人程某犯污染环境罪,判处有期徒刑9个月,并处罚金4万元。被告人曾某犯污染环境罪,判处有期徒刑8个月,并处罚金2万元。被告人姚某犯污染环境罪,判处有期徒刑6个月,缓刑2年,并处罚金1万元。

(7)  【指导性意义】

(8)  本案是向长江干流排放污水引发的水污染刑事案件。其中,某环保公司作为具有工业废水处理资质的企业,在受托处理工业废水过程中,明知调节池有渗漏现象,仍将未经完全处理的电镀废水以渗漏方式直接向长江干流排放,严重污染长江水体,应当依法承担刑事责任。人民法院充分发挥环境资源审判职能作用,综合全案情节,对具有废水处理资质的某环保公司酌情从重处罚,为服务保障长江流域生态文明建设提供了较好范本。

(9)  责任编辑:王瑜